Mercedes-Benz EQAvsTata Punch EV
Detailed side-by-side comparison of Mercedes-Benz EQA and Tata Punch EV including price, specifications, mileage, safety features and more.
Quick Verdict
Mercedes-Benz EQA vs Tata Punch EV — Specifications
| Price & Overview | ||
| ₹72.20 Lakh - ₹78.90 Lakh | Price (Ex-Showroom) | ₹12.00 Lakh - ₹16.00 Lakh |
| SUV | Body Type | SUV |
| 5 Seats | Seating | 5 Seats |
| Electric | Fuel Types | Electric |
| Manual | Transmission | Manual |
| 1 | Variants | 20 |
| Engine & Performance | ||
| - | Engine | - |
| 188 bhp | Max Power | 121 bhp |
| 385 Nm | Max Torque | 190 Nm |
| - | Mileage (ARAI) | - |
| 160 kmph | Top Speed | 150 kmph |
| 37 L | Fuel Tank | 37 L |
| FWD | Drive Type | FWD |
| Dimensions | ||
| 4463 mm | Length | 3857 mm |
| 1834 mm | Width | 1742 mm |
| 1608 mm | Height | 1633 mm |
| - | Wheelbase | 2445 mm |
| 154 mm | Ground Clearance | 190 mm |
| 340 L | Boot Space | 366 L |
| Safety | ||
| 6 | Airbags | 6 |
| - | NCAP Rating | - |
Variant-wise Comparison
The Mercedes-Benz EQA is available in 1 variants (₹67.20 Lakh — ₹67.20 Lakh), while the Tata Punch EV has 20 variants (₹9.99 Lakh — ₹14.44 Lakh). Select specific variants below to compare detailed specifications, features and pricing.
| ₹67.20 Lakh | Ex-Showroom | ₹9.99 Lakh |
| - | Price Difference | ₹57.21 Lakh cheaper |
| On-Road Prices | ||
| ₹79.30 Lakh | Bangalore | ₹11.79 Lakh |
| ₹77.95 Lakh | Chennai | ₹11.59 Lakh |
| ₹75.26 Lakh | Delhi | ₹11.19 Lakh |
| ₹76.61 Lakh | Hyderabad | ₹11.39 Lakh |
| ₹77.28 Lakh | Mumbai | ₹11.49 Lakh |
Related Comparisons
Mercedes-Benz EQA vs Tata Punch EV — FAQ
Which is better, Mercedes-Benz EQA or Tata Punch EV?▼
Both the Mercedes-Benz EQA and Tata Punch EV are strong choices in the SUV segment. The Mercedes-Benz EQA is priced from ₹72.20 Lakh while the Tata Punch EV starts at ₹12.00 Lakh. The Tata Punch EV is the more affordable option. Compare the detailed specifications above to decide which suits your needs best.
Mercedes-Benz EQA vs Tata Punch EV — which is cheaper?▼
The Tata Punch EV is cheaper, starting at ₹12.00 Lakh (ex-showroom). The price difference between the base variants is approximately ₹60.20 Lakh.
Mercedes-Benz EQA vs Tata Punch EV — which has better mileage?▼
The Mercedes-Benz EQA offers N/A kmpl while the Tata Punch EV offers N/A kmpl (ARAI certified). Both offer similar fuel efficiency.
Mercedes-Benz EQA vs Tata Punch EV — which is more powerful?▼
The Mercedes-Benz EQA produces 188 bhp of maximum power, while the Tata Punch EV produces 121 bhp. The Mercedes-Benz EQA is the more powerful car.
Which car is safer, Mercedes-Benz EQA or Tata Punch EV?▼
The Mercedes-Benz EQA comes with 6 airbags, while the Tata Punch EV has 6 airbags. Both cars offer comparable safety equipment.
Mercedes-Benz EQA vs Tata Punch EV — which has more boot space?▼
The Mercedes-Benz EQA offers 340 litres of boot space, while the Tata Punch EV offers 366 litres. The Tata Punch EV has the larger boot.
How many variants are available for Mercedes-Benz EQA and Tata Punch EV?▼
The Mercedes-Benz EQA is available in 1 variants, while the Tata Punch EV comes in 20 variants. Both are available in Electric and Electric fuel options respectively.
Mercedes-Benz EQA vs Tata Punch EV — dimensions comparison?▼
The Mercedes-Benz EQA measures 4463 mm (L) x 1834 mm (W) x 1608 mm (H) with a N/A mm wheelbase. The Tata Punch EV measures 3857 mm (L) x 1742 mm (W) x 1633 mm (H) with a 2445 mm wheelbase.
Can I compare specific variants of Mercedes-Benz EQA and Tata Punch EV?▼
Yes! Use the variant selector above to compare any specific variant of Mercedes-Benz EQA (1 variants) with any variant of Tata Punch EV (20 variants). The comparison covers price, engine, mileage, comfort features, safety equipment, infotainment and more.
Which is the best value variant — Mercedes-Benz EQA or Tata Punch EV?▼
The base variant of Mercedes-Benz EQA (250 Plus) starts at ₹67.20 Lakh, while the Tata Punch EV base variant (Smart) starts at ₹9.99 Lakh. Use the variant-wise comparison tool above to compare features at each price point.

